"Why I'm a critic"
1. Why do you argue from incredulity against observed phenomena?
"Only God"
2. Can you provide a working definition of kind?
3. How could every kind live on an ark?
4. Do you agree that Carolus Linneaus was pressured to separate humans and chimps?
"Why I'm a Critic? Part 2"
5. If the eye was designed why do we need glasses?
6. How do our eyes compare to other animals?
7. How is design intuitively obvious?
8. Do you understand emergence?
"Questions"
"Grammar help, please.."
"The Eye... Bad Design?"
10. Do you think the human eye is badly designed?
11. Can you support the assertion that the eye is designed?
12. Do you understand why not being able to easy define a species supports evolution?
13. How could several types of wolves, foxes and dogs evolve into their current forms in 6000 years?
14. Given your purported rapid evolution of canines why is it so improbably humans evolved from a common ancestor with apes?
"Mormon's -- Funny Vid!"
"Problems with Health Care"
"Design"
15. Why do you quote a moonie when questioning evolution?
16. Can you define design?
17. What about your god doesn't match your definition from question 16?
"Just Curious"
"Information in DNA"
18. How does information, in and of itself, support design?
"Cosmological Blog Post"
19. What about the big bang's cause implies a god?
20. Why do you parody Dawkins in a post on physics?
21. How do you measure time?
22. If you don't know how to measure time without the sun, why do you make an assertion that an eternity of time is absurd?
"Math and Infinity"
23. Why did you quote mine?
24. Do you understand the David Hilbert quote in its entirety?
"Atheistic Relativism -- Real?"
25. Do you understand the diference between general relativity and moral relativity?
26. What about Christian morality is objective?
27. Considering the previous 27 ignored questions, how are you any better than the Mormons in your video? Vagon
My answers:
1. The eyes that are doing the observing are in itself an incredulity.
2. Animals that bring forth after their kinds. Also, I did respond, I said that unless I get a working definition of 'species' I wouldn't define kind.
3. The ark was big, he didn't bring every species, bugs, birds, or fish -- only mammal kinds.
4. Possibly, not sure--but he was a Christian.
5. Fallen creation--are lenses get old.
6. I couldn't compare our eyes to ALL the other animals; nevertheless, they're different than most other animals. Maybe I'll write a longer post on this later.
7. When you see a building...
8. Things must have a cause.
10. No.
11. Yes, and I will in later posts.
12. No, but I suppose it does; taking into account all the interbreeding and mutations over "millions" of years.
13. Interbreeding and environment
14. That's given my assertion is true -- I'm not sure.
15. Was just showing that I'm not the only one saying it.
16. "Purpose, planning, or intention that exists or is though to exist behind an action, fact, or material object"
17. God, smart and powerful ect, is a simple Spirit--an immaterial, unen-bodied Spirit. Besides that, He's eternal.
18. Information requires an informer. It only makes sense.
19. The big bang requires a beginning, a beginning requires a beginner.
20. Because, even though he's a biologist, he talks about physics and other topics he should stay away from.
21. I don't understand the question.
22. Time is a dimension, does eternity live with time?
23. I didn't.
24. I don't know it in entirety, I read it somewhere--do you know it.
25. Yes, two different topics.
26. God is absolute, His laws are absolute.
27. Good thesis, on your part.
Sorry for the short answers... not much time.